Skip to content

: selection: routing: promote terminals true and false (not just true) #508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shayne-fletcher
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: it never came up before due to there being no surface syntax for False but terminal promotion should by symmetry be the same for False as exists for True.

Differential Revision: D78169907

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label Jul 11, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78169907

shayne-fletcher added a commit to shayne-fletcher/monarch-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
pytorch-labs#508)

Summary:

it never came up before due to there being no surface syntax for `False` but terminal promotion should by symmetry be the same for `False` as exists for `True`.

Differential Revision: D78169907
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78169907

shayne-fletcher added a commit to shayne-fletcher/monarch-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
pytorch-labs#508)

Summary:

it never came up before due to there being no surface syntax for `False` but terminal promotion should by symmetry be the same for `False` as exists for `True`.

Differential Revision: D78169907
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78169907

…ytorch-labs#507)

Summary:

handle 0d slices by canonically embedding them as 1d slices of extent 1, enabling uniform evaluation and routing logic. adds test coverage for  `eval` and `next_steps`.

Differential Revision: D78168758
pytorch-labs#508)

Summary:

it never came up before due to there being no surface syntax for `False` but terminal promotion should by symmetry be the same for `False` as exists for `True`.

Differential Revision: D78169907
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78169907

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants